The new set of “panelists” is quite a curious angle and they'd be yawners, if not for their dubious nature. Timberlake (Mr. Wardrobe Malfunction himself), Allison (a blogger–really?) and Andrews (whose recent transparent PR campaign of a fuzzy nude video for wider name recognition reeks of phoniness) are hardly a reach-out to family friendly living rooms.

Even Peyton's goodwill capital won't mask over this bunch of celebrity louts for the Sony name. They may have over-thought this one.

i do understand why you would believe that i “live in the world of rbns” given what this comment section has evolved into. however, this is far from the truth. yes, i am aware of its existence. i've visited the site exactly one time. actually, it could have been an earlier version of the site or even an entirely different site altogether. it was during the tumblr controversy and i was curious about the site(s) being affected. was it anything more than internet snark? short answer, no.

i have no interest in rbns. i can't imagine analyzing anyone ad nauseam. honestly, i wish miss allison well, but when i read about sony's new campaign and her inclusion in it i was confused. in my opinion she is a poor choice as brand ambassador and i have every right to express my displeasure to sony or anyone else.

also, it is interesting that nearly every single one of her defenders is placing blame on rbns. (though i must admit i fall into the same trap. i assume because 'pretend sony customer' sounds like miss allison it must be her) it isn't that simple. there are a lot of negative articles and comments about miss allison on the internet. there has almost always been some sort of negative blowback in regards to her. an example would be her wired cover story. i feel pretty confident in saying rbns was not responsible for that either.

i'm surprised that i'm responding to you. if you do happen to read this i hope you don't feel offended even though i was.